Skip to main content

Bless the Lord, all you works of the Lord

Krus at Lipunan: A Filipino Theology of Liberation


“Bless the Lord, all you works of the Lord”

Boyet Dalogdog


Image source: INQUIRER.net Facebook page


"Bless the Lord, all you works of the Lord, praise and exalt him above all forever." (Daniel 3:57, NABRE) Every handiwork of God — whether great or small — gives praise to the Creator. The whole of creation sings a continuous hymn, glorifying the One who grants each creature its very being. To silence even one of them is not merely an act of environmental negligence; it is a theological affront — it deprives that creature of its rightful participation in the chorus of creation.

"Ang sakit sa mata pagmasdan itong kapuputol lang na puno na para bang literal na dumudugo pa." (It is a pain in the eyes to look at this freshly cut tree — it literally looks like it is still bleeding.) These were the words of GMA News reporter Mark Salazar in a reel that found its way into my social media feed. Reportedly, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) granted a permit — an Environmental Compliance Certificate — to cut down decades-old trees to make way for the Southern Access Link Expressway, a project by San Miguel Corporation (SMC).

This project is expected to fell 617 trees along Quirino Avenue to construct a 3.97-kilometer elevated expressway. As of my research, at least 225 trees had already been cut down, among them a 50-year-old Narra — a tree that is, by no coincidence, our national tree. DENR requires SMC to plant 50,700 tree seedlings within the City of Manila to offset what was destroyed.

Predictably, this decision drew public backlash. Individuals and institutions alike expressed their grief and outrage. And one question, achingly simple, demands an answer: How much of the environment can we afford to sacrifice on the altar of economic development?

This incident is but one episode in an unrelenting story of human intervention across the archipelago — exploitation dressed in the language of progress. Rivers and mountains are quarried for gravel and filling material. Forests are cleared for urban expansion, displacing the wildlife that found sanctuary in them. Shorelines are reclaimed, crushing fragile habitats beneath the weight of concrete, all to furnish more ground for development. The logic of profit has colonized our imagination of the future.

As political leadership remains captive to self-serving ambitions and corporate opportunism advances unchecked, who, then, will stand in defense of creation against the relentless advance of human greed? This is not merely a political question, it is a profoundly moral and spiritual one. Upholding the integrity of creation, what the late Pope Francis rightly called our "common home," is a responsibility that transcends faith, politics, and race. It is a duty inscribed in our very humanity.

And yet the deeper crisis lies not in science but in morality. The ecological crisis is, at its root, a moral crisis, a crisis of how we see, value, and relate to creation. St. Pope John Paul II declared as much in his 1990 World Day of Peace Message, Peace with God the Creator, Peace with All of Creation. Just as workers have long been reduced to mere "human capital," instruments serving an economic end rather than persons bearing inviolable dignity, so too has creation been reduced to a reservoir of exploitable resources. The parallel is not accidental. The oppression of the poor and the degradation of the earth share the same root: the treating of persons and creation as objects of profit. As Pope Francis wrote, "Everything is connected" (Laudato Si', no. 91) — and thus, ecological justice falls squarely within the scope of the Church's social teaching.

Pope Benedict XVI further underscores the Church's call to protect creation:

"The environment is God's gift to everyone, and in our use of it we have a responsibility towards the poor, towards future generations and towards humanity as a whole." (Caritas in Veritate, no. 48)

To protect the environment is to practice intergenerational justice, to acknowledge that the children of tomorrow will inherit not our wealth, but the consequences of our greed. Whoever planted those trees cut down to build an expressway once dreamed of something enduring: shade, clean air, a living legacy. That dream was brought to its end by chainsaws fueled with greed and licensed by bureaucracy. Can decades of growth ever be replaced by seedlings scattered elsewhere? Given the extent of Manila's urbanization, I doubt that 50,700 seedlings can even be planted. And if planted, who will ensure they survive? What mechanism does DENR have to monitor their growth, to protect them from neglect, from concrete, from the next wave of development? The deeper question remains: can any number of seedlings ever restore the present benefits that 617 living trees provided daily, the shade for pedestrians, the pollutants absorbed year after year along the crowded sidewalks of Quirino Avenue?

Every person, Catholic or not, has not only the right but the moral imperative to be disturbed — to be angry, at this unjust felling of trees. And not only this, but at every injustice committed when human greed exploits creation, leaving the poor to bear the full devastation of its effects while the wealthy quietly count their profits. "Man's dominion over inanimate and other living beings… is not absolute." (Catechism of the Catholic Church, no. 2415) The silence of creation must not be mistaken for consent. That it cannot speak or defend itself does not make it a tool for our use without moral consequence. "The use of mineral, vegetable, and animal resources of the universe cannot be divorced from respect for moral imperatives." (CCC, no. 2415)

May Filipinos grow not only in their socio-political consciousness but, more urgently, in their ecological consciousness, learning to demand justice for creation with the same passionate intensity with which they cry out when innocent human lives are violently taken away. "Living our vocation to be protectors of God's handiwork is essential to a life of virtue." (Laudato Si', no. 217) The tree that bleeds is not merely a tree. It is a sacramental sign, a wound in the body of our common home, a silent indictment of who we are choosing to become.

 

________________

 

About the author, he is a theology and philosophy lecturer based in Zamboanga City. Formed in Pastor Bonus Seminary in Zamboanga City and St. John Vianney Theological Seminary in Cagayan de Oro City, his work in the academe bridge rigorous philosophical inquiry with deep pastoral theology. Known for his public lectures in institutions of higher education in Zamboanga City  which he intricately connects faith, and contemporary morality, bringing a distinct, modern ministerial voice to Catholic literature.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Krus at Lipunan: A Filipino Theology of Liberation “Not a Silent Yes: Mary, Mother of God, and the Cry of Filipino Women Against Violence”   The Solemnity of Mary, Mother of God is often received in Catholic piety as a gentle and consoling feast, marked by images of serene motherhood and quiet obedience. Yet such domesticated portrayals risk muting the disruptive power of this celebration. Properly understood, the title  Theotokos,  Mary as God-bearer, is not a sentimental honorific but a theological and political claim: God enters history through the body, consent, and risk of a woman. In societies where women’s bodies continue to be sites of control, abuse, and violence, this claim is anything but neutral. In the Philippine context, where gender-based violence remains widespread, the Solemnity of Mary confronts the Church with an uncomfortable question: what does it mean to venerate the Mother of God while women’s dignity is daily violated? The affirmation of Mary...

ALIAS OVES HABEO || “I have other sheep that do not belong to this fold. These also I must lead, and they will hear my voice, and there will be one flock, one shepherd.” (Jn 10:16)

ALIAS OVES HABEO Screenshot from Philippine Star Facebook Page “I have other sheep that do not belong to this fold. These also I must lead, and they will hear my voice, and there will be one flock, one shepherd.” (Jn 10:16) Jesus mentioned in the Johannine Gospel that there are other sheep which he must lead. These sheep do not belong to the flock on whom these words were addressed. According to some biblical commentaries, these pertains to other group of ‘Apostolic Christians’ who does not go along for some unknown reason with the Johannine community. The beloved disciple tries to convey among his audience that no one has the monopoly of Christ, the Good Shepherd.  He is the Good Shepherd that searches for the lost (cf. Mt 18:12-14; Lk 15:3-7) and prayed for all the Father has given him (Jn 17:6-26) that all of us may become one like his oneness with the Father. When John told the Lord that they prevent someone who cast away demons in his name simply because this person does not b...